Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-Refoulement and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe

Bibliography File Note.

Type
Journal Article

Author
Jennifer Hyndman

Author
Alison Mountz

URL
http://ift.tt/2bmzsUN

Volume
43

Issue
02

Pages
249–269

Publication
Government and Opposition

ISSN
1477-7053

Date
January 2008

DOI
10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00251.x

Accessed
2016-08-12 03:36:58

Library Catalog
Cambridge Journals Online

Abstract
Insecurity and fear in the global North produce political space to advance security measures, including the externalization of asylum. States in the global North make it increasingly difficult for asylum seekers to reach sovereign territory where they might make a refugee claim. While legal protection remains intact under the Refugee Convention, extra-legal measures employ geography to restrict access to asylum and keep claimants at bay through a variety of tactics. This article probes the ways in which fear of uninvited asylum seekers is securitized and looks at the tactics utilized to keep them at bay, far from the borders of states that are signatories to the UN Refugee Convention. Drawing on research in Europe and Australia, we demonstrate how states are promoting ‘protection in regions of origin’ through practices of de facto neo-refoulement. Neo-refoulement refers to a geographically based strategy of preventing asylum by restricting access to territories that, in principle, provide protection to refugees.

Short Title
Another Brick in the Wall?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s